Systematic Review Writing — PRISMA 2020-Aligned, Cochrane-Style

Reviewed by Fiz Tak, QA Manager · ResearchProspect Canada

Full PRISMA 2020 workflow: search strategy, dual-screening with kappa, quality assessment (Cochrane RoB / NOS / AMSTAR-2), narrative synthesis — for thesis chapters and journal submissions.

Prices starting from just CA$35 CA$30 for undergraduate level.

Expert Canadian Writers

Plagiarism-free

AI-Free

100% Satisfaction

Speak to us on WhatsApp

Why Canadian students trust ResearchProspect

100% AI-Free, Human-Written

100% AI-Free, Human-Written

Every order is written from scratch by a PhD-qualified human specialist. We never use AI to generate the prose — only for research support (sourcing, summarisation), fully disclosed per Canadian academic-integrity policy. Your work passes Turnitin AI detection because it is, in fact, human-written.

Plagiarism-Free, Turnitin-Checked

Plagiarism-Free, Turnitin-Checked

Every paper is screened with Turnitin-equivalent plagiarism software before delivery. You receive a free originality report with the final order — see the similarity score before you submit, with full confidence the work is original.

Confidential & PIPEDA-Aligned

Confidential & PIPEDA-Aligned

Encrypted file handling, NDA available on request, and your name, university, and order details are never shared, resold, or republished. Strict PIPEDA-aligned Canadian privacy practice — trusted by 80,000+ Canadian students since 2011.

WHY RESEARCHERS CHOOSE OUR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SERVICE

What you get with a systematic review order

PRISMA 2020 Workflow

Full PRISMA 2020 reporting: PICO question, database selection, search strings, screening, quality assessment, synthesis. Flow diagram + reporting checklist included.

Learn more

Dual Screening

Two reviewers independently screen titles/abstracts then full texts. Cohen’s kappa reported for inter-rater reliability. Disagreements resolved by third reviewer.

Learn more

Quality Appraisal

Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for RCTs, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies, AMSTAR-2 for reviews, JBI tools for qualitative.

Learn more

GRADE Synthesis

GRADE evidence-quality assessment per outcome (high/moderate/low/very low). Strength of recommendations documented for clinical reviews.

Learn more
What our customers say

Trusted by 80,000+ researchers

★★★★★

PRISMA accepted as-is

My nursing systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 exactly. Editor accepted the flow diagram, screening kappa, and GRADE table without revision. Published in JBI Evidence Synthesis.

Dr Manon T.

★★★★★

Cochrane-style RoB nailed

17-RCT review on hypertension interventions. Risk-of-Bias 2.0 assessment per trial. Reviewer appreciated the per-domain bias judgements.

Tomas P.

★★★★★

Qualitative meta-synthesis

My education-research systematic review was qualitative (thematic synthesis of 12 interview studies). Analyst used JBI tools + Thomas-Harden framework. A grade.

Inara K.

Canadian Academic Specialists

Subject-matter writers you can count on since 2011

PhD-qualified writers handle the research, structure, and referencing — so you stay on top of coursework and deadlines without burning out.

✔️ 100% plagiarism-checked & Turnitin-ready
✔️ PhD subject specialists
✔️ On-time delivery, every time
✔️ Confidential, encrypted handling
Place an order
ResearchProspect Canada Team
ACADEMIC WRITING EXPERTS

Get matched with a PhD-qualified writer

Each of our 1,140+ writers holds a Master’s or PhD and has been vetted on academic-writing rubrics across APA, MLA, Chicago, and Harvard. Browse a few of our active writers below or place an order to be matched in minutes.

View All Writers
PhD-qualified academic writers

Daniel Turner

Writer Online
4.9 ★★★★½

PhD in Business Studies. Analytical and argument-led academic writing, with a sharp focus on Canadian university rubrics.

Qualification: PhD
Subject: Business Studies
Writer ID: RP1024
Hire Writer

Sophie Moore

Writer Online
5.0 ★★★★★

Master’s in English Literature. Reflective, narrative, and admissions writing that reads clean, structured, and on-rubric.

Qualification: Master’s
Subject: English Literature
Writer ID: RP1107
Hire Writer

Michael Reed

Writer Online
4.8 ★★★★½

PhD in Sociology. Strong on critical-theory work and Canadian policy analysis. APA / MLA / Chicago.

Qualification: PhD
Subject: Sociology
Writer ID: RP1218
Hire Writer

Olivia Grant

Writer Online
4.9 ★★★★½

Master’s in Psychology. Case-based and quantitative writing, with an eye for clear thesis statements.

Qualification: Master’s
Subject: Psychology
Writer ID: RP1331
Hire Writer

Hannah Lewis

Writer Online
5.0 ★★★★★

PhD in Education. Teaches academic writing; her work comes back with very few revision rounds.

Qualification: PhD
Subject: Education
Writer ID: RP1456
Hire Writer

James Carter

Writer Online
4.8 ★★★★½

Master’s in Political Science. Persuasive, argumentative, and policy-led academic writing grounded in primary-source evidence.

Qualification: Master’s
Subject: Political Science
Writer ID: RP1572
Hire Writer
How it works

Three steps to place an order

1

Provide Your Details

Send us your brief through the order form. Receive a quote in Canadian dollars within minutes.

2

Writer Starts Working

A subject-matched PhD specialist begins work straight away after payment is confirmed.

3

Receive and Relax!

Our QA team reviews the work before delivery. Download from the portal, submit, relax.

Transparent Canadian Pricing

Systematic Review Service from CA$74 / page

All prices in Canadian dollars. PhD-tier pricing reflects systematic-review specialism. Includes search + screening + quality appraisal + synthesis + writing. Meta-analysis component priced separately if required. Use the order form for a CAD quote.

Undergraduate
Bachelor’s level
From
CA$30 / page
5-day delivery
Get a Quote
PhD & Doctoral
Doctoral level
From
CA$74 / page
5-day delivery
Get a Quote
WHY RESEARCHERS CHOOSE OUR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SERVICE

Systematic reviews built to Cochrane and JBI standards

Systematic reviews require a documented, replicable methodology — not the “I read 30 papers and synthesised them” approach of a narrative review. PRISMA 2020 specifies exactly what to document at each stage. Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute have specific tools per study design. Our analysts apply all of it.

PRISMA 2020 reporting (flow diagram + checklist)
Dual-screening with kappa-statistic inter-rater reliability
Cochrane RoB 2.0 for RCTs; NOS for observational; JBI for qualitative
AMSTAR-2 for umbrella reviews (reviews of reviews)
GRADE evidence-quality assessment per outcome
Narrative synthesis or quantitative meta-analysis option
CANADIAN EDUCATION, BY THE NUMBERS

Built around real Canadian academic standards

96 universities

Including UofT, McGill, UBC, Waterloo, and Western — we match each project to the right style guide.

Source: Universities Canada

1.4M+ students

Canadian post-secondary enrolment, 2022/23 — we cover every discipline these students study.

Source: Statistics Canada

TCPS 2 alignment

Every brief follows Canada’s national standard for research integrity (TCPS 2).

Source: TCPS 2 (2022) — ethics.gc.ca

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FAQs

What researchers ask before commissioning a systematic review

How does this differ from a literature review?
Literature review can be narrative or thematic. Systematic review follows a documented, replicable methodology (PRISMA 2020), with explicit search strategy, dual-screening, quality assessment, and synthesis protocol. Different rigor, different word count, different reviewer expectations.
Do you include meta-analysis?
Meta-analysis is an optional add-on. Quantitative systematic reviews usually include one; qualitative systematic reviews use thematic synthesis instead. See meta-analysis service for the statistical synthesis step.
Which quality-assessment tools do you use?
Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for randomised trials; Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies; AMSTAR-2 for umbrella reviews; JBI tools for qualitative; QUADAS-2 for diagnostic accuracy. Tool selection matched to included study designs.
What is GRADE?
GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) rates evidence quality per outcome as high/moderate/low/very low based on study design, risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Standard for clinical-guideline reviews. Read our quality control process.
Can you do qualitative systematic reviews?
Yes — meta-synthesis (Thomas-Harden), meta-ethnography (Noblit-Hare), meta-aggregation (JBI). For broader qualitative-research support see research paper writing.
How much does a systematic review cost?
PhD-tier pricing CA$74/page covering search + screening + appraisal + synthesis + writing. Meta-analysis add-on priced separately. Full schedule on the how-it-works page.

Why Choose Our Systematic Review Service in Canada?

A systematic review is a research methodology, not a writing format. The protocol is documented in advance (often pre-registered on PROSPERO), the search is replicable from the published strings, the screening is dual-reviewer with kappa reliability, the quality assessment uses standardised tools per study design, and the synthesis follows PRISMA 2020. Our analysts apply the whole framework, not just the writing.

  • PROSPERO pre-registration support for protocol documentation before screening begins.
  • PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion) with exact counts per stage.
  • Database selection per topic: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, IEEE Xplore.
  • Dual-screening: two reviewers independently, Cohen’s kappa reported (>0.6 acceptable, >0.8 strong).
  • Quality assessment tools per design: Cochrane RoB 2.0 (RCTs), NOS (cohort/case-control), JBI (qualitative), AMSTAR-2 (umbrella).
  • GRADE evidence-quality assessment per outcome with strength-of-recommendations rating.
  • Narrative or quantitative (meta-analysis) synthesis depending on study heterogeneity.

Get Through Peer Review With Our #1 Systematic Review Service

Systematic reviews get rejected at peer review for one of three reasons: search strategy not reproducible, screening reliability not documented, or quality assessment not matched to study design. Most “review writing” services trip on at least one of these. Our PRISMA-aligned workflow forces documentation at each stage so reviewers can replicate every decision.

For statistical meta-analysis as part of (or separate from) a systematic review see meta-analysis service. For narrative/thematic literature reviews see literature review writing. For full thesis chapters incorporating the review see dissertation writing.

Standard turnaround is 28-49 days depending on database scope, included-study count, and quality-assessment complexity. PROSPERO pre-registration adds 2 weeks. Output files: PRISMA diagram (.svg), screening logs (.xlsx), quality-assessment matrices, and the review chapter. Full pricing on the how-it-works page.

Different Types of Systematic Reviews We Conduct

  • Cochrane-style intervention reviews (RCTs, RoB 2.0)
  • Observational systematic reviews (cohort, case-control, NOS)
  • Diagnostic-test-accuracy reviews (QUADAS-2)
  • Qualitative meta-synthesis (Thomas-Harden, Noblit-Hare)
  • JBI meta-aggregation reviews
  • Mixed-methods systematic reviews
  • Umbrella reviews / overviews of reviews (AMSTAR-2)
  • Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR)
Money-Back Guarantee How It Works Quality Control Client Reviews About Us

Have Questions? Ask Our Team

Speak to us about your project — in under two minutes, get a personalised quote in CAD.