Systematic Review Writing — PRISMA 2020-Aligned, Cochrane-Style

Reviewed by Fiz Tak, QA Manager · ResearchProspect Canada

Full PRISMA 2020 workflow: search strategy, dual-screening with kappa, quality assessment (Cochrane RoB / NOS / AMSTAR-2), narrative synthesis — for thesis chapters and journal submissions.

Prices starting from just CA$35 CA$30 for undergraduate level.

Expert Canadian Writers

Plagiarism-free

AI-Free

100% Satisfaction

Speak to us on WhatsApp

Why Canadian students trust ResearchProspect

100% AI-Free, Human-Written

100% AI-Free, Human-Written

Every order is written from scratch by a PhD-qualified human specialist. We never use AI to generate the prose — only for research support (sourcing, summarisation), fully disclosed per Canadian academic-integrity policy. Your work passes Turnitin AI detection because it is, in fact, human-written.

Plagiarism-Free, Turnitin-Checked

Plagiarism-Free, Turnitin-Checked

Every paper is screened with Turnitin-equivalent plagiarism software before delivery. You receive a free originality report with the final order — see the similarity score before you submit, with full confidence the work is original.

Confidential & PIPEDA-Aligned

Confidential & PIPEDA-Aligned

Encrypted file handling, NDA available on request, and your name, university, and order details are never shared, resold, or republished. Strict PIPEDA-aligned Canadian privacy practice — trusted by 80,000+ Canadian students since 2011.

WHY RESEARCHERS CHOOSE OUR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SERVICE

What you get with a systematic review order

PRISMA 2020 Workflow

Full PRISMA 2020 reporting: PICO question, database selection, search strings, screening, quality assessment, synthesis. Flow diagram + reporting checklist included.

Learn more

Dual Screening

Two reviewers independently screen titles/abstracts then full texts. Cohen’s kappa reported for inter-rater reliability. Disagreements resolved by third reviewer.

Learn more

Quality Appraisal

Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for RCTs, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies, AMSTAR-2 for reviews, JBI tools for qualitative.

Learn more

GRADE Synthesis

GRADE evidence-quality assessment per outcome (high/moderate/low/very low). Strength of recommendations documented for clinical reviews.

Learn more
What our customers say

Trusted by 80,000+ researchers

★★★★★

PRISMA accepted as-is

My nursing systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 exactly. Editor accepted the flow diagram, screening kappa, and GRADE table without revision. Published in JBI Evidence Synthesis.

Dr Manon T.

★★★★★

Cochrane-style RoB nailed

17-RCT review on hypertension interventions. Risk-of-Bias 2.0 assessment per trial. Reviewer appreciated the per-domain bias judgements.

Tomas P.

★★★★★

Qualitative meta-synthesis

My education-research systematic review was qualitative (thematic synthesis of 12 interview studies). Analyst used JBI tools + Thomas-Harden framework. A grade.

Inara K.

Canadian Academic Specialists

Subject-matter writers you can count on since 2011

PhD-qualified writers handle the research, structure, and referencing — so you stay on top of coursework and deadlines without burning out.

✔️ 100% plagiarism-checked & Turnitin-ready
✔️ PhD subject specialists
✔️ On-time delivery, every time
✔️ Confidential, encrypted handling
Place an order
ResearchProspect Canada Team
ACADEMIC WRITING EXPERTS

Get matched with a PhD-qualified writer

Each of our 1,140+ writers holds a Master’s or PhD and has been vetted on academic-writing rubrics across APA, MLA, Chicago, and Harvard. Browse a few of our active writers below or place an order to be matched in minutes.

View All Writers
PhD-qualified academic writers

Daniel Turner

Writer Online
4.9 ★★★★½

PhD in Business Studies. Analytical and argument-led academic writing, with a sharp focus on Canadian university rubrics.

Qualification: PhD
Subject: Business Studies
Writer ID: RP1024
Hire Writer

Sophie Moore

Writer Online
5.0 ★★★★★

Master’s in English Literature. Reflective, narrative, and admissions writing that reads clean, structured, and on-rubric.

Qualification: Master’s
Subject: English Literature
Writer ID: RP1107
Hire Writer

Michael Reed

Writer Online
4.8 ★★★★½

PhD in Sociology. Strong on critical-theory work and Canadian policy analysis. APA / MLA / Chicago.

Qualification: PhD
Subject: Sociology
Writer ID: RP1218
Hire Writer

Olivia Grant

Writer Online
4.9 ★★★★½

Master’s in Psychology. Case-based and quantitative writing, with an eye for clear thesis statements.

Qualification: Master’s
Subject: Psychology
Writer ID: RP1331
Hire Writer

Hannah Lewis

Writer Online
5.0 ★★★★★

PhD in Education. Teaches academic writing; her work comes back with very few revision rounds.

Qualification: PhD
Subject: Education
Writer ID: RP1456
Hire Writer

James Carter

Writer Online
4.8 ★★★★½

Master’s in Political Science. Persuasive, argumentative, and policy-led academic writing grounded in primary-source evidence.

Qualification: Master’s
Subject: Political Science
Writer ID: RP1572
Hire Writer
How it works

Three steps to place an order

1

Provide Your Details

Send us your brief through the order form. Receive a quote in Canadian dollars within minutes.

2

Writer Starts Working

A subject-matched PhD specialist begins work straight away after payment is confirmed.

3

Receive and Relax!

Our QA team reviews the work before delivery. Download from the portal, submit, relax.

Transparent Canadian Pricing

Systematic Review Service from CA$74 / page

All prices in Canadian dollars. PhD-tier pricing reflects systematic-review specialism. Includes search + screening + quality appraisal + synthesis + writing. Meta-analysis component priced separately if required. Use the order form for a CAD quote.

Undergraduate
Bachelor’s level
From
CA$30 / page
5-day delivery
Get a Quote
PhD & Doctoral
Doctoral level
From
CA$74 / page
5-day delivery
Get a Quote
WHY RESEARCHERS CHOOSE OUR SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SERVICE

Systematic reviews built to Cochrane and JBI standards

Systematic reviews require a documented, replicable methodology — not the “I read 30 papers and synthesised them” approach of a narrative review. PRISMA 2020 specifies exactly what to document at each stage. Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute have specific tools per study design. Our analysts apply all of it.

✓PRISMA 2020 reporting (flow diagram + checklist)
✓Dual-screening with kappa-statistic inter-rater reliability
✓Cochrane RoB 2.0 for RCTs; NOS for observational; JBI for qualitative
✓AMSTAR-2 for umbrella reviews (reviews of reviews)
✓GRADE evidence-quality assessment per outcome
✓Narrative synthesis or quantitative meta-analysis option
CANADIAN EDUCATION, BY THE NUMBERS

Built around real Canadian academic standards

96 universities

Including UofT, McGill, UBC, Waterloo, and Western — we match each project to the right style guide.

Source: Universities Canada

1.4M+ students

Canadian post-secondary enrolment, 2022/23 — we cover every discipline these students study.

Source: Statistics Canada

TCPS 2 alignment

Every brief follows Canada’s national standard for research integrity (TCPS 2).

Source: TCPS 2 (2022) — ethics.gc.ca

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FAQs

What researchers ask before commissioning a systematic review

How does this differ from a literature review?
Literature review can be narrative or thematic. Systematic review follows a documented, replicable methodology (PRISMA 2020), with explicit search strategy, dual-screening, quality assessment, and synthesis protocol. Different rigor, different word count, different reviewer expectations.
Do you include meta-analysis?
Meta-analysis is an optional add-on. Quantitative systematic reviews usually include one; qualitative systematic reviews use thematic synthesis instead. See meta-analysis service for the statistical synthesis step.
Which quality-assessment tools do you use?
Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 for randomised trials; Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies; AMSTAR-2 for umbrella reviews; JBI tools for qualitative; QUADAS-2 for diagnostic accuracy. Tool selection matched to included study designs.
What is GRADE?
GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) rates evidence quality per outcome as high/moderate/low/very low based on study design, risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Standard for clinical-guideline reviews. Read our quality control process.
Can you do qualitative systematic reviews?
Yes — meta-synthesis (Thomas-Harden), meta-ethnography (Noblit-Hare), meta-aggregation (JBI). For broader qualitative-research support see research paper writing.
How much does a systematic review cost?
PhD-tier pricing CA$74/page covering search + screening + appraisal + synthesis + writing. Meta-analysis add-on priced separately. Full schedule on the how-it-works page.

Why Choose Our Systematic Review Service in Canada?

A systematic review is a research methodology, not a writing format. The protocol is documented in advance (often pre-registered on PROSPERO), the search is replicable from the published strings, the screening is dual-reviewer with kappa reliability, the quality assessment uses standardised tools per study design, and the synthesis follows PRISMA 2020. Our analysts apply the whole framework, not just the writing.

  • PROSPERO pre-registration support for protocol documentation before screening begins.
  • PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion) with exact counts per stage.
  • Database selection per topic: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, IEEE Xplore.
  • Dual-screening: two reviewers independently, Cohen’s kappa reported (>0.6 acceptable, >0.8 strong).
  • Quality assessment tools per design: Cochrane RoB 2.0 (RCTs), NOS (cohort/case-control), JBI (qualitative), AMSTAR-2 (umbrella).
  • GRADE evidence-quality assessment per outcome with strength-of-recommendations rating.
  • Narrative or quantitative (meta-analysis) synthesis depending on study heterogeneity.

Get Through Peer Review With Our #1 Systematic Review Service

Systematic reviews get rejected at peer review for one of three reasons: search strategy not reproducible, screening reliability not documented, or quality assessment not matched to study design. Most “review writing” services trip on at least one of these. Our PRISMA-aligned workflow forces documentation at each stage so reviewers can replicate every decision.

For statistical meta-analysis as part of (or separate from) a systematic review see meta-analysis service. For narrative/thematic literature reviews see literature review writing. For full thesis chapters incorporating the review see dissertation writing.

Standard turnaround is 28-49 days depending on database scope, included-study count, and quality-assessment complexity. PROSPERO pre-registration adds 2 weeks. Output files: PRISMA diagram (.svg), screening logs (.xlsx), quality-assessment matrices, and the review chapter. Full pricing on the how-it-works page.

Different Types of Systematic Reviews We Conduct

  • Cochrane-style intervention reviews (RCTs, RoB 2.0)
  • Observational systematic reviews (cohort, case-control, NOS)
  • Diagnostic-test-accuracy reviews (QUADAS-2)
  • Qualitative meta-synthesis (Thomas-Harden, Noblit-Hare)
  • JBI meta-aggregation reviews
  • Mixed-methods systematic reviews
  • Umbrella reviews / overviews of reviews (AMSTAR-2)
  • Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR)
Money-Back Guarantee How It Works Quality Control Client Reviews About Us

Have Questions? Ask Our Team

Speak to us about your project — in under two minutes, get a personalised quote in CAD.